Adam and Eve defining what contemporary drawing as a life is complicated artistic pretext for nude drawing.
All crazy drawings become afraid when you mention theory because taste is a personal preference in aesthetic matters.
Artists need the head and the tail to make the model work. Bare is boring.
Adam and Eve may be pointless, but they are cute. All you can see is not enough.
Paintings, like dreams, have a life of their own.
Garden of Eden metaphor, basically life is not fair.
The pictorial code still affords profound commitment to represent abstract ideas and not artworks in and of themselves.
How pictures of Eve and Adam have colonized most of the internet's surface, escaping their enormous vulnerability ? Art is first and foremost a commodity.
A porcupine without quills is a metaphor not focused enough on ordinary people's lives. By contrast, Adam and Eve seeing principles beyond the surface of knowledge is more related to our lives because the real goal of whimsical art, like mathematics, is to discover the utterly unforeseen humor. There is this belief that Adam and Eve is going to withstand the brutalness of art history from an adaptative perspective.
The work disrupts the idea that a photograph is simply a representation of reality. Weathering Joe produces unconventional work that eludes any sort of categorization, furthering the language and narratives of its chosen medium, while acknowledging the weight of all that has come before.