Contemporary art itself has been stripped of its ideological cloak. "Art in a box" is usually empty; pictures rule the universe.
If works of art are empty, why should visitors be any more upset by garish packaging, not empty, on supermarket shelves?
Edward Said, You must have cool art pictures to prove your statement.
How to believe in beauty, if beauty only is market-friendly prettiness in contemporary art?
Cool artistic things believe in beautiful pictures; don't just talk about art issues, show pictures of contemporary art issues.
The art crisis is a loss of meaning because rebel art is not separable from artsy silliness. Silly art is beginning to wonder whether the internet has taken that idea past its logical extremes.
Does art have to be beautiful when math is cool ?