But actually, the scientific independence of unicorms seems to have been misunderstood. It makes us crazy to wonder what unicorns would have done with a full training in genetics and informatics.
There is a lingering debate over the two schools of hypothesis for the evidence underlying unicorn sightings, where do you draw the line?
A new body of work? Have you any evidence for that? I know nothing about it.
What counts is not so-called knowledge of so-called unicorn facts, but vision, seeing. Seeing implies and is coupled with fantasy, and imagination.
A new body of work? Have you any evidence for that? With error bars and everything? A bit like a bird attempting to fly with one wing.