Better switching to everyday art than petting the supremacy of pure aesthetics
Slower-moving models are easier to draw, but less likely to expand the expanding formats of art. Leaving out the big theories (of art) in favor of a silly point of view.
Interesting artworks are born bizarre, precisely because they are less learning through imitation.
Art is precisely between the picture and the image. Stretched canvas covered with paint also may be art, often without understanding statistically whether some brush effect is a meaningful change.
Art is between representation and imagination, therefore nowhere, non existent in the empty space.
This is the paradox of the non-existence of art (unrelated to traditional imagery with a satirical twist, that is supermodernity)
what is a visual metaphor in art? These are the sort of questions that a critic can pose, but only artists can answer.
What is Aphrodite like ?
Do the arts still measure the gap between what is shown and what is meant ?
Imagination is real art, even for mundane everyday artworks.
